|
SUPER TOURNAMENTS
Free game files be downloaded on this page. Information about single or combined tournaments can be found on linked internet pages. At least one participant in a super tournament belongs to the top ten. Criteria for the selection of an event are 1) playing strength of the participants, and 2) historical interest. New annotations were written by Jan van Reek. The quality might surprise, because analysis used to be the domain of over-the-board grandmasters. Nowadays, a computer can calculate variations at the same level. Scientific ability has become more important.
Explication My work on chess
tournaments started in 2001. At that time I was still working on chess matches.
Normally I plan my work precisely, but this did not happen with the selection of
tournaments. The task was too immense probably. I started with a list of forty
events. The work kept me busy until the end of 2002. A new idea came from
a record by Glenn Giffen. He had rank ordered chess tournaments by the number
of participating top ten players. His list has been extended to one hundred
events. Another problem was the selection from series. This has been solved
for Linares by the inclusion of all events. The result became a fine mix of
outstanding and historical tournaments. There was no other site with annotated
games from old events. So I had to develop a standard. When I started to
analyse, all games of Moscow 1957 were investigated. The mental effort was
immense, and the time-consuming computer work caused mouse arms. Thereafter game
selections were made generally. Previous analysis can
be found in tournament books, journals and computer files. Arend Booij helps me
in the literature search. Some games have never been analysed, but abundant
information is available mostly. Then the real work begins, because the quality
of the original data is often poor and later authors add little valuable
information. All selected
games are deeply analysed with the latest chess programs and a fast computer. Mostly one or two known
comments survive the test on correctness and relevance. I often add a few notes.
Despite this drastic method, other annotators have been treated respectfully,
because their contributions are mentioned correctly and without sarcasm on
errors. I have made fewer
comments on tournaments than on matches, because the interest for historical
tournament games is limited. If a reader wants to investigate an extra detail, a
chess engine can be started. The method of short comments has been applied by Euwe many times. This
routine looks simple but the application is difficult. When Spassky and I were
cooperating, we favoured
annotations as a string of brief reflections on critical positions. It makes the
highlights of a chess event quickly accessible for the reader. Example of a correction: The
shown position occurred in the famous game Spassky - Fischer, Santa Monica
1966. Boris played 28. Qd2?! When
I was analysing, I saw the witty 28. Nh5! A computer test revealed the
variation 28. .. Qf7 29. Qc3� Kh7 30. Qg3 Bc8 31. Rc1 and White has a
strong attack. Thereafter
I noticed the retort 28. .. Be4! Computer analysis disclosed the line 29.
Nxf6 Bxc2 30. Nd7 Bxd1 31. Nxf8 and White has a fine endgame. Therefore, the computer research
supported the search for better variations. I regard the
combination of an internet page and file as an internet book. The
oeuvre has been 'work in progress' for eight years. More than 650,000 match and tournament
books have been downloaded. Other tournaments: Dutch
championships (from 1851)
German chess congresses (from 1861)
History of correspondence chess (from 1824)
All Hastings tournaments (from 1895)
IBM Amsterdam (1961-1981)
Leopold Trebitsch Memorial (1907 - 1938)
Cloister tournaments (1966-1997) Matches:
Chess matches (from 1574) Females:
Women beat men
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||