|
SUPER TOURNAMENTS
Free game files be downloaded on this page. Information about single or combined tournaments can be found on linked internet pages. At least one participant in a super tournament belongs to the top ten. Criteria for the selection of an event are 1) playing strength of the participants, and 2) historical interest. New annotations were written by Jan van Reek. The quality might surprise, because analysis used to be the domain of over-the-board grandmasters. Nowadays, a computer can calculate variations at the same level. Scientific ability has become more important.
Explication
My work on chess tournaments started in 2001. At that time I was still working on chess matches. Normally I plan my work precisely, but this did not happen with the selection of tournaments. The task was too immense probably. I started with a list of forty events. The work kept me busy until the end of 2002. A new idea came from a record by Glenn Giffen. He had rank ordered chess tournaments by the number of participating top ten players. His list has been extended to one hundred events. Another problem was the selection from series. This has been solved for Linares by the inclusion of all events. The result became a fine mix of outstanding and historical tournaments. There was no other site with annotated games from old events. So I had to develop a standard. When I started to analyse, all games of Moscow 1957 were investigated. The mental effort was immense, and the time-consuming computer work caused mouse arms. Thereafter game selections were made generally. Previous analysis can be found in tournament books, journals and computer files. Arend Booij helps me in the literature search. Some games have never been analysed, but abundant information is available mostly. Then the real work begins, because the quality of the original data is often poor and later authors add little valuable information. All selected games are deeply analysed with the latest chess programs and a fast computer. Mostly one or two known comments survive the test on correctness and relevance. I often add a few notes. Despite this drastic method, other annotators have been treated respectfully, because their contributions are mentioned correctly and without sarcasm on errors. I have made fewer comments on tournaments than on matches, because the interest for historical tournament games is limited. If a reader wants to investigate an extra detail, a chess engine can be started. The method of short comments has been applied by Euwe many times. This routine looks simple but the application is difficult. When Spassky and I were cooperating, we favoured annotations as a string of brief reflections on critical positions. It makes the highlights of a chess event quickly accessible for the reader.
I regard the combination of an internet page and file as an internet book. The oeuvre has been 'work in progress' for eight years. More than 500,000 match and tournament books have been downloaded.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||